As conversations around neurodiversity, particularly ADHD and autism, continue to evolve, recent legal developments have provided meaningful clarity on how these conditions are treated under UK employment law. For HR professionals and business leaders, this presents an opportunity to reflect on current practices and how best to support neurodivergent talent.
Legal Update: Stedman v Haven Leisure
In the case of Stedman v Haven Leisure, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) was asked to consider whether a diagnosed condition of ADHD and autism met the legal definition of disability under the Equality Act 2010.
Key takeaways from the case include:
A clinical diagnosis can provide strong evidence of both an impairment and its impact on daily life.
Only one day-to-day activity needs to be substantially affected for the condition to meet the definition of disability.
Employers should focus on the difficulties a person faces because of their condition, not just their capabilities.
The comparison should be between the individual's functioning with and without the condition, rather than against others.
While the ruling does not change the law, it offers helpful clarification and may influence how similar cases are approached in the future.
Understanding Neurodiversity
Neurodiversity refers to the natural variation in how people think and process information. The term encompasses conditions such as autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and dyspraxia. According to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), adopting a neuroinclusive mindset means recognising and valuing these cognitive differences rather than viewing them through a lens of deficit.
The Strategic Value of Neuroinclusion
Embracing neurodiversity is not only a matter of legal compliance but also a strategic business decision.
Neurodivergent employees often contribute exceptional strengths, including:
Innovative problem-solving
Meticulous attention to detail
Deep focus and perseverance
Unique perspectives that challenge conventional thinking
According to the UK Government’s expert panel on neurodiversity in employment, there is significant untapped potential among neurodivergent individuals, yet only 31% of autistic adults are currently employed, compared to 54.7% of all disabled individuals. Improving access and support in the workplace can help close this gap.
Practical Steps to Improve Inclusion
Organisations do not need to overhaul their operations to better support neurodivergent staff. Many changes are simple, cost-effective, and impactful. Guidance from Acas and the CIPD suggests the following measures:
Recruitment Practices
Use straightforward language in job advertisements
Provide interview questions in advance
Offer alternative formats for applications
Consider skills-based assessments over traditional interviews
Adjustments in the Workplace
Offer quiet spaces or noise-reduction tools
Allow flexible working hours and remote options where appropriate
Provide assistive technology tailored to individual needs
Building Inclusive Culture
Incorporate neurodiversity into training and awareness programmes
Establish internal support networks or peer groups
Celebrate initiatives such as Neurodiversity Celebration Week
Encourage inclusive leadership practices across all levels
Legal Obligations
Under the Equality Act 2010, employers have a duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees, including those with neurodivergent conditions. Importantly, this duty applies regardless of whether the employee has a formal diagnosis.
Final Thoughts
The Stedman case acts as a timely prompt for businesses to evaluate whether their policies and practices meet both legal requirements and societal expectations. But beyond risk reduction, the real opportunity lies in creating a working environment where diverse ways of thinking are recognised as assets.
By fostering a culture that supports neurodivergent staff, organisations can improve team dynamics, drive innovation, and position themselves as forward-thinking employers.
Share this post: